tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8996974684243527907.post3155651844347828853..comments2023-10-23T00:23:28.842-07:00Comments on BIGFOOT'S bLOG: PART TWO: M. K. DAVIS Interview and Discussion with BIGFOOT BOOKSSteven Streuferthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07852437322070677310noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8996974684243527907.post-842980531548207812013-02-01T12:51:32.829-08:002013-02-01T12:51:32.829-08:00"Secrecy" is there for one reason and on..."Secrecy" is there for one reason and one reason only... to cover up the bullshit, and the fact that there are no "facts" in these ridiculous theories. Steven Streuferthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07852437322070677310noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8996974684243527907.post-39299483309086786322013-01-31T18:41:16.851-08:002013-01-31T18:41:16.851-08:00Steven,
Mr. Davis's sudden conclusion to your ...Steven,<br />Mr. Davis's sudden conclusion to your interview is similar to the cloak and dagger secrecy of more recent events surrounding the Ketchum DNA fiasco, Smeja and Dyer's apparent shooting events, and the more recent confirmed hoax of Daisy in the box. You're a seasoned vet in the bigfoot world, serious about what you do..that is evident. Why do you suppose such events like MK's termination of interview et al. seem to have an air of secrecy about them? Why do such folks see need to shroud their activities in secrecy? Seems to me that if it is about holding out for financial gain, that secrecy is counter intuitive to that. I just don't get it. To finally provide tangible proof of existence (and a subsequent massacre) would be the camelot moment of all time, and such a person would have immortality in the history of human evolution. If you got the goods, so to speak, why would you hide it from public view?<br />Anyway, interesting interview right up to the point where he crawfished back into mystery. Regards.rDRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11038606606918884172noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8996974684243527907.post-66790969157289868952011-02-28T12:43:08.247-08:002011-02-28T12:43:08.247-08:00I see BABY BIGFOOTS everywhere!!!I see BABY BIGFOOTS everywhere!!!Steven Streuferthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13009889858114835143noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8996974684243527907.post-44129069399885470072011-02-25T11:10:48.083-08:002011-02-25T11:10:48.083-08:00Odd isn't it that MK could find a handprint on...Odd isn't it that MK could find a handprint on the log but didn't see the spotted dog and white cat. Check the image with the hand print, barefoot print, etc. in yellow letters. If you focus between the words barefoot and print and look straight up to the far side of the log there is a white object - the cat. The dog is partically sheilded by the cat.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8996974684243527907.post-64534853038242071422010-01-05T13:25:31.789-08:002010-01-05T13:25:31.789-08:00There is always "MORE" to EVERY story. B...There is always "MORE" to EVERY story. BUT, in this case, there is simply NO EVIDENCE for the story that MK has made up. It is pure imagination. Plus, if one is going to issue accusations of murder you'd think one would at least have some proof, something more than color-altered videos that are not even in the right place on the historical timeline. MK was not "crucified" by me. I tried to get him to talk, explain himself. The more he is silent on these matters the more the thing just festers. He wasn't just talking in a private group about these things--he put it up all over the internet and YouTube. This amounts to a conscious attempt to spread the propaganda. MK is a good guy, so he should just renounce this theory publicly, and then we can all move on to more important matters like finding Bigfoot.Steven Streuferthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07852437322070677310noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8996974684243527907.post-84939983899148067492010-01-02T12:14:51.265-08:002010-01-02T12:14:51.265-08:00Well,I must say that I think MK has been unjustly ...Well,I must say that I think MK has been unjustly crucified by the so-called "bigfoot community". He has a right to his beliefs and from what is known,he was simply bouncing around possibilities with a private group of friends/fellow researchers when all of this jumped out of hand from the start. I'm not saying I totally agree with MK on every issue,however,I do feel,after listening to various interviews and such,that there is much more to the story than we have been told. I do believe that Roger and Bob encountered 100% sasquatch on that day but just maybe a little more happened than what we are told. Put yourself in their shoes...at that time no one really had an idea whether sasquatch would attack or if it was safe to be near them. I'm not saying that they shot a squatch,just that maybe there is more to the story. I do get the feeling that some questions have been "delicately handled" by those involved in those fateful days of 1967. I will always hold John Green,Bob Gimlin,Roger Patterson,Grover Krantz,Rene Dahinden and Peter Byrne dear to my heart as they were childhood heroes of mine. However,they are men and,as we all know,men are not perfect by any means. I just hope we can get past this..get the whole truth and move on to try and find one of these magnificent beings before they become extinct like so many species. Thank you for a very interesting read.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8996974684243527907.post-57190899927708608822009-12-22T11:42:21.090-08:002009-12-22T11:42:21.090-08:00Amazing, simply amazing. Daniel PerezAmazing, simply amazing. Daniel PerezAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com